*GIF created by me
Sunday, 31 March 2013
Trailer Review 6
Name of film: John Carpenter’s The Fog
Year Released: 1980
Genre of Trailer: Psychological Horror
My Mark after Viewing: 6/10
What happened in the trailer?
From the beginning of the trailer, the audience is introduced to the narrative by a narrator. Titled as ‘John Carpenter’s The Fog’, there is a clear indication that Carpenter, as the writer of the screenplay, is prolific in the field of horror (it is also later mentioned that he is the mind behind Halloween). The first thing we see is a woman in a radio station, welcoming the listeners to the 100th birthday of the town of Antonio Bay. A warning of fog sparks fear as the narrator begins repeating this phrase three times, changing just one word: “One hundred years ago, between midnight and one, something [unknown / unnatural / evil] came out of the fog. Now it has returned.”
From the beginning of the trailer, the audience is introduced to the narrative by a narrator. Titled as ‘John Carpenter’s The Fog’, there is a clear indication that Carpenter, as the writer of the screenplay, is prolific in the field of horror (it is also later mentioned that he is the mind behind Halloween). The first thing we see is a woman in a radio station, welcoming the listeners to the 100th birthday of the town of Antonio Bay. A warning of fog sparks fear as the narrator begins repeating this phrase three times, changing just one word: “One hundred years ago, between midnight and one, something [unknown / unnatural / evil] came out of the fog. Now it has returned.”
Throughout this narration, events occur on screen which
alludes to something dangerous and unnatural. Firstly, a couple is spooked as
their car spins out of control through the fog. Then, a fire appears to
spontaneously break out in the control tower. After seeing a shot of a
grappling hook and hearing an off screen commotion, one of the local residents
speaks of a curse left on the island. Small jumps occur as one of the female
characters goes to walk away, too scared of the situation, before a man’s body
collapses onto her and she screams, building up the tension.
“Get inside and lock your doors. Close the windows. There’s
something in the fog.” This warning from the narrator is played as the action
unfolds and the characters try to escape whatever the thing is which is
attacking them. There is then a list of the credits for actors in the film,
each face appearing projected onto the face of a pocket watch.
“What you can’t see won’t hurt you. It will kill you.
Between midnight and one, it will find you.” These ominous threats are the last
thing said by the narrator, alongside a shot of a struggling victim and the
main title screen to finish.
Which positive, clever or interesting aspects do you
think you could include in your own trailer?
In general, I have found that narration can make some trailers seem tacky. This one, however, uses precise timing and repetition to reinforce the thriller aspect of the film. More of a mystery case than a horror, the film uses the narration as a way of providing useful backstory. One of the best aspects of the trailer is the use of restricted narration. Not once do we ever see the monster/villain/danger in this film, cleverly masked by the fog. This gives the film a unique identity and adds an air of creepiness and unease throughout. Also due to the fog, the lighting remains consistently low key, a classic horror element. Through the use of establishing long shots, and tight close-ups, the cinematography easily matches the feel of many of the classic horror movies and creates a tense atmosphere.
In general, I have found that narration can make some trailers seem tacky. This one, however, uses precise timing and repetition to reinforce the thriller aspect of the film. More of a mystery case than a horror, the film uses the narration as a way of providing useful backstory. One of the best aspects of the trailer is the use of restricted narration. Not once do we ever see the monster/villain/danger in this film, cleverly masked by the fog. This gives the film a unique identity and adds an air of creepiness and unease throughout. Also due to the fog, the lighting remains consistently low key, a classic horror element. Through the use of establishing long shots, and tight close-ups, the cinematography easily matches the feel of many of the classic horror movies and creates a tense atmosphere.
Which aspects of the trailer did you think were unsuccessful,
and would put off its target audience? How is it disappointing?
Made in 1980, this film has much less of the flashy technology and CGI than today’s action-packed horror films. The trailer, however, should showcase some of its more gripping moments. Unfortunately, probably due to restrictions and age limits, this film shows absolutely no gory or particularly scary moments. For the most part, some of the clips selected are too long and look more like scenes than highlights. As well as this, to try to build up the tension without showing gore, some of the reactions and shots seem overly dramatic. Although the fog adds a very clever balance of restricted narration, this poses the problem of trying to sell the movie. Without showing any glimpses of the person/monster, people could either watch the movie expecting it to be tame, or they could be turned off by the lack of explicit horror. The addition of the narration does make the trailer more tense, however, it also can make the thing seem cliché and is less likely to work for us in regards to a modern audience. At times, it also became a bit boring with its cinematography. There were very few non-static shots and everything was filmed straight on, without the use of any canted, low, or high angles. To make a big impact, our trailer should try to experiment with as many different shot types as possible.
Made in 1980, this film has much less of the flashy technology and CGI than today’s action-packed horror films. The trailer, however, should showcase some of its more gripping moments. Unfortunately, probably due to restrictions and age limits, this film shows absolutely no gory or particularly scary moments. For the most part, some of the clips selected are too long and look more like scenes than highlights. As well as this, to try to build up the tension without showing gore, some of the reactions and shots seem overly dramatic. Although the fog adds a very clever balance of restricted narration, this poses the problem of trying to sell the movie. Without showing any glimpses of the person/monster, people could either watch the movie expecting it to be tame, or they could be turned off by the lack of explicit horror. The addition of the narration does make the trailer more tense, however, it also can make the thing seem cliché and is less likely to work for us in regards to a modern audience. At times, it also became a bit boring with its cinematography. There were very few non-static shots and everything was filmed straight on, without the use of any canted, low, or high angles. To make a big impact, our trailer should try to experiment with as many different shot types as possible.
Texas Chainsaw Massacre 3D Trailer Review
Name of film: Texas Chainsaw Massacre 3D
Year Released: 2013
Genre of Trailer: Horror (Highlights)
My Mark after Viewing: 8/10
What happened in the trailer?
This trailer follows the story of a young girl who has recently learnt about the passing of her grandmother, the owner of a large house in the middle of nowhere. She and her friends take this opportunity to stay at the newly abandoned house. However, whilst exploring it, they come across the evil Leatherface. We first see him sitting at a desk, threading a needle and trying on the legendary mask of sewn up skin. This is when the group starts realising something is wrong and, one by one, he comes after them in various horrific ways. A direct sequel to the 1974 classic, much of the story is new, but a lot of the traditional horror elements are still present. As a green band trailer, there is absolutely no gore, yet there is enough to keep the audience satisfied and wanting to see more. The new appeal of this film is the fact that it is also in 3D, never before seen in any previous Texas Chainsaw film.
This trailer follows the story of a young girl who has recently learnt about the passing of her grandmother, the owner of a large house in the middle of nowhere. She and her friends take this opportunity to stay at the newly abandoned house. However, whilst exploring it, they come across the evil Leatherface. We first see him sitting at a desk, threading a needle and trying on the legendary mask of sewn up skin. This is when the group starts realising something is wrong and, one by one, he comes after them in various horrific ways. A direct sequel to the 1974 classic, much of the story is new, but a lot of the traditional horror elements are still present. As a green band trailer, there is absolutely no gore, yet there is enough to keep the audience satisfied and wanting to see more. The new appeal of this film is the fact that it is also in 3D, never before seen in any previous Texas Chainsaw film.
Which positive, clever or interesting aspects do you
think you could include in your own trailer?
The trailer begins agonisingly slowly in a way which makes the film look like another indie teen movie. With the addition of a calm soundtrack and long takes, the pace is set well from the beginning. One particularly interesting aspect is the dip to black effect used for many of the opening shots to slow down the time for narrative. This is instantly followed by a slightly faster build up with the introduction of intertitles cross-cutting with shots of the villain, Leatherface. The most captivating feature of this trailer, I found, was the soundtrack. It begins with the simple acoustic guitar song before going deathly quiet and being interrupted by the loud eruption of the sound of chainsaws for a few brief seconds. After returning to a quiet dripping tap, the sound is almost non-existent, up until Leatherface puts a chainsaw onto one of the girls’ shoulders and she screams against a gag. After that point, there is a weird vibrating sound followed by the build-up of a strings section, culminating in the final, shocking clip of the girl in the coffin and the loud noise of the chainsaw, once again. This soundtrack changes the entire pace of the trailer throughout and sets the tone for each individual section. Overall, it has a good narrative structure in which the characters and story line are introduced, then the villain, then the action. The trailer follows many conventions of traditional horror without being too explicit either. It also has no need for a narration because of the well-integrated intertitles which explain the connection with the original film and the new story. Restricted narration is used particularly well here to make it appear scary without showing anything gory.
The trailer begins agonisingly slowly in a way which makes the film look like another indie teen movie. With the addition of a calm soundtrack and long takes, the pace is set well from the beginning. One particularly interesting aspect is the dip to black effect used for many of the opening shots to slow down the time for narrative. This is instantly followed by a slightly faster build up with the introduction of intertitles cross-cutting with shots of the villain, Leatherface. The most captivating feature of this trailer, I found, was the soundtrack. It begins with the simple acoustic guitar song before going deathly quiet and being interrupted by the loud eruption of the sound of chainsaws for a few brief seconds. After returning to a quiet dripping tap, the sound is almost non-existent, up until Leatherface puts a chainsaw onto one of the girls’ shoulders and she screams against a gag. After that point, there is a weird vibrating sound followed by the build-up of a strings section, culminating in the final, shocking clip of the girl in the coffin and the loud noise of the chainsaw, once again. This soundtrack changes the entire pace of the trailer throughout and sets the tone for each individual section. Overall, it has a good narrative structure in which the characters and story line are introduced, then the villain, then the action. The trailer follows many conventions of traditional horror without being too explicit either. It also has no need for a narration because of the well-integrated intertitles which explain the connection with the original film and the new story. Restricted narration is used particularly well here to make it appear scary without showing anything gory.
Which aspects of the trailer did you think were
unsuccessful, and would put off its target audience? How is it disappointing?
The issue with a green band horror trailer is the restrictions placed upon what things and cannot be shown. Watching it the first time, you could be mistaken for thinking that the trailer makes it look like a particularly gory, scary horror film. Having watching it multiple times, the truth is that there is not one single shot of explicit gore. However, this is an issue for the film’s target audience. Particularly looking at die-hard horror fans who love the original, Texas Chainsaw Massacre fails to highlight any of the gore which is particularly thrilling or disturbing – one of the major deal breakers for a lot of horror fans. Seeing as this franchise is well known for its body horror, this may be a problem. One of the other big issues I found came towards the end of the trailer in which the main female protagonist gets into the coffin, hiding from Leatherface. The tension here is well built whilst the screen is in black. However, this pause is much too long and makes the ending of the trailer feel cliché. There is possibly no jump scare here because the audience has too much time to prepare for it. Instead, there could have been another section after the title of the film – however, it cut straights to the credits instead.
The issue with a green band horror trailer is the restrictions placed upon what things and cannot be shown. Watching it the first time, you could be mistaken for thinking that the trailer makes it look like a particularly gory, scary horror film. Having watching it multiple times, the truth is that there is not one single shot of explicit gore. However, this is an issue for the film’s target audience. Particularly looking at die-hard horror fans who love the original, Texas Chainsaw Massacre fails to highlight any of the gore which is particularly thrilling or disturbing – one of the major deal breakers for a lot of horror fans. Seeing as this franchise is well known for its body horror, this may be a problem. One of the other big issues I found came towards the end of the trailer in which the main female protagonist gets into the coffin, hiding from Leatherface. The tension here is well built whilst the screen is in black. However, this pause is much too long and makes the ending of the trailer feel cliché. There is possibly no jump scare here because the audience has too much time to prepare for it. Instead, there could have been another section after the title of the film – however, it cut straights to the credits instead.
Shaun of the Dead Trailer Review
Name of film: Shaun of the Dead
Year Released: 2004
Genre of Trailer: Rom-Com-Zom Action Horror
My Mark after Viewing: 7/10
What happened in the trailer?
This trailer begins by establishing our protagonist: Shaun. It follows all the menial tasks he does every day of his life and compares this lifestyle to that of a modern zombie. He works, visits his girlfriend and goes to the pub. This equilibrium is then disrupted when a news report mentions a new influx of zombie attacks. At this news, Shaun and his best friend, Ed, set off to equip their group of friends to fight off the monsters. Through a series of highlights we see them defend the pub, fight off two people by throwing vinyl discs at their head, and attack a man with snooker cues, all culminating in a scene with the two friends performing the beats of a song with a zombie.
This trailer begins by establishing our protagonist: Shaun. It follows all the menial tasks he does every day of his life and compares this lifestyle to that of a modern zombie. He works, visits his girlfriend and goes to the pub. This equilibrium is then disrupted when a news report mentions a new influx of zombie attacks. At this news, Shaun and his best friend, Ed, set off to equip their group of friends to fight off the monsters. Through a series of highlights we see them defend the pub, fight off two people by throwing vinyl discs at their head, and attack a man with snooker cues, all culminating in a scene with the two friends performing the beats of a song with a zombie.
Which positive, clever or interesting aspects do you
think you could include in your own trailer? What generic features are
fulfilled well?
From the beginning, it is made clear that this movie is a comedy as much as anything else. They do this through both dialogue and slapstick humour. Although this isn’t what we plan for our own film, some good one-liners and catchphrases can make the trailer memorable and give a better understanding of the characters to the audience. The characters’ costumes also play a big part in revealing things about their personalities and could be an aspect we take into consideration when choosing what props and outfits to use in our own trailer. At the start, Shaun acts as the narrator, talking about the mundanity of modern life. In other international versions of this trailer, there is a different voiceover saying very much the same things. One particularly good aspect of the film is its British-ness. This film would not look the same if it were set in a fancy American suburb, so its locations and dialogue are very important to the believability of the narrative. These aspects of a non-glamorous hero narrating his own trailer makes the character relatable and add to the comedy. As well as the unconventional aspects, there are some limited moments of body horror and gore. In parts, there is also an element of psychological horror in which the zombies surround the group’s hiding places and bang on the windows. Unconventionally, a lot of this film is set during the day which means there is limited use of low-key lighting. As we will, most likely, be filming during the day, many of these aspects could be useful when we storyboard how to work around this issue.
From the beginning, it is made clear that this movie is a comedy as much as anything else. They do this through both dialogue and slapstick humour. Although this isn’t what we plan for our own film, some good one-liners and catchphrases can make the trailer memorable and give a better understanding of the characters to the audience. The characters’ costumes also play a big part in revealing things about their personalities and could be an aspect we take into consideration when choosing what props and outfits to use in our own trailer. At the start, Shaun acts as the narrator, talking about the mundanity of modern life. In other international versions of this trailer, there is a different voiceover saying very much the same things. One particularly good aspect of the film is its British-ness. This film would not look the same if it were set in a fancy American suburb, so its locations and dialogue are very important to the believability of the narrative. These aspects of a non-glamorous hero narrating his own trailer makes the character relatable and add to the comedy. As well as the unconventional aspects, there are some limited moments of body horror and gore. In parts, there is also an element of psychological horror in which the zombies surround the group’s hiding places and bang on the windows. Unconventionally, a lot of this film is set during the day which means there is limited use of low-key lighting. As we will, most likely, be filming during the day, many of these aspects could be useful when we storyboard how to work around this issue.
Which aspects of the trailer did you think were
unsuccessful, and would put off its target audience? How is it disappointing?
As this trailer is much shorter than most theatrical trailers, there is less time to show many of the highlights. It is also, more than likely, a green band trailer because the gore shown on screen is very limited. Although this means it can be played to a larger audience, it also means that the target audience is missing out on one of the big selling points of the film. Also due to the length, a lot of the shots are very short takes and much of the trailer is hard to follow because it moves at such a fast pace. In general, there is less focus on the horror aspect in this trailer and it is aimed more at the ‘comedy’ audience. At times there is also the issue that the action horror can be farcical and look more like slapstick than a tough team of zombie fighters. There is also the addition of a romantic couple at the centre of the film. Although this is typical of many horror films, it may not be best for our trailer. In addition, a large percentage of the trailer is taken up with a fuel for the narrative: the news reports. Although these are helpful, they were too prominent in such a short trailer. The trailer also ended on a comedic moment in which Shaun and Ed drunkenly perform the beats of a song with a zombie. This moment could have left much more of a thrill with a jump scare or even some gore/horror through restricted narration, instead.
As this trailer is much shorter than most theatrical trailers, there is less time to show many of the highlights. It is also, more than likely, a green band trailer because the gore shown on screen is very limited. Although this means it can be played to a larger audience, it also means that the target audience is missing out on one of the big selling points of the film. Also due to the length, a lot of the shots are very short takes and much of the trailer is hard to follow because it moves at such a fast pace. In general, there is less focus on the horror aspect in this trailer and it is aimed more at the ‘comedy’ audience. At times there is also the issue that the action horror can be farcical and look more like slapstick than a tough team of zombie fighters. There is also the addition of a romantic couple at the centre of the film. Although this is typical of many horror films, it may not be best for our trailer. In addition, a large percentage of the trailer is taken up with a fuel for the narrative: the news reports. Although these are helpful, they were too prominent in such a short trailer. The trailer also ended on a comedic moment in which Shaun and Ed drunkenly perform the beats of a song with a zombie. This moment could have left much more of a thrill with a jump scare or even some gore/horror through restricted narration, instead.
Toxic Avenger Trailer Review
Name of film: The Toxic Avenger
Year Released: 1986
Genre of Trailer: Comedy Horror
My Mark after Viewing: 5/10
What happened in the trailer?
To accompany the shots in this trailer, the audience is also supplied with a voiceover to narrate the images on screen and to provide the narrative. We begin with the character of Melvin and he is seen being bullied and tormented by his peers and unappreciated by the adults. Running away from his problem, Melvin accidently falls into a barrel of toxic waste. After becoming hideously deformed and gaining superhuman power, he becomes the Toxic Avenger. He uses his skills to take the law into his own hands by defeating evil-doers and getting his own back on those who ridiculed him. Although, for the main part, the film is a comedy, this trailer does include the beginnings of some gory moments and some sexual scenes. The film addresses the themes of acceptance, action and even love at one point. Because of this, it tries to appeal to a wider audience.
To accompany the shots in this trailer, the audience is also supplied with a voiceover to narrate the images on screen and to provide the narrative. We begin with the character of Melvin and he is seen being bullied and tormented by his peers and unappreciated by the adults. Running away from his problem, Melvin accidently falls into a barrel of toxic waste. After becoming hideously deformed and gaining superhuman power, he becomes the Toxic Avenger. He uses his skills to take the law into his own hands by defeating evil-doers and getting his own back on those who ridiculed him. Although, for the main part, the film is a comedy, this trailer does include the beginnings of some gory moments and some sexual scenes. The film addresses the themes of acceptance, action and even love at one point. Because of this, it tries to appeal to a wider audience.
Which positive, clever or interesting aspects do you
think you could include in your own trailer? What generic features are
fulfilled well?
Right from the beginning, the audience is made aware of the comedy elements of the film. This hybrid genre of comedy and horror means the film has a much wider appeal and can attract various film lovers with something for everyone. Plus, although the narration is hyperbolic and extremely overt, this adds to the comedy and actually gives the audience a thoughtful insight into the story of the character. This voiceover idea comes across as a parody of the early horror trailers of the ’40s and ‘50s, in which dramatic music and a serious delivery were enough to have audiences flocking to the theatre to watch the latest scary movie. Although the comedy is a main aspect, the film is still seen as more of a horror than anything else. This trailer, although not showing anything explicit, builds up a lot of gory, horrific events which are, undoubtedly, more appealing when seen in full as part of the entire film. In this sense, the trailer effectively sells not only humour, but also gore. Plus, being such a long trailer, this gives more time for longer ‘scene’-style highlights to draw in the audience. The aspect I would like to include in our own trailer would be to establish a narrative as well as this, but without the use of a voiceover.
Right from the beginning, the audience is made aware of the comedy elements of the film. This hybrid genre of comedy and horror means the film has a much wider appeal and can attract various film lovers with something for everyone. Plus, although the narration is hyperbolic and extremely overt, this adds to the comedy and actually gives the audience a thoughtful insight into the story of the character. This voiceover idea comes across as a parody of the early horror trailers of the ’40s and ‘50s, in which dramatic music and a serious delivery were enough to have audiences flocking to the theatre to watch the latest scary movie. Although the comedy is a main aspect, the film is still seen as more of a horror than anything else. This trailer, although not showing anything explicit, builds up a lot of gory, horrific events which are, undoubtedly, more appealing when seen in full as part of the entire film. In this sense, the trailer effectively sells not only humour, but also gore. Plus, being such a long trailer, this gives more time for longer ‘scene’-style highlights to draw in the audience. The aspect I would like to include in our own trailer would be to establish a narrative as well as this, but without the use of a voiceover.
Which aspects of the trailer did you think were
unsuccessful, and would put off its target audience? How is it disappointing?
At over 3 minutes long, this trailer drags on for far too long and the audience begins to lose interest in the film quite quickly. Our trailer will, therefore, have to include only the most important scenes, and try to condense them as much as possible. Although the trailer clearly demonstrates its comedy elements right from the start, some of it is too overt and ends up looking very slapstick. This could alienate a large audience in the form of the horror fanbase. Without fast pace or rhythm there is absolutely no tension or build up and no shots of anything gory to get the audience interested in coming to see it. In many ways, the film is also of its time. To a modern mainstream audience, there is very little appeal in a film with such crude effects and a strange narrative. In the ‘80s, however, it fit the zeitgeist of comedy in tragedy.
At over 3 minutes long, this trailer drags on for far too long and the audience begins to lose interest in the film quite quickly. Our trailer will, therefore, have to include only the most important scenes, and try to condense them as much as possible. Although the trailer clearly demonstrates its comedy elements right from the start, some of it is too overt and ends up looking very slapstick. This could alienate a large audience in the form of the horror fanbase. Without fast pace or rhythm there is absolutely no tension or build up and no shots of anything gory to get the audience interested in coming to see it. In many ways, the film is also of its time. To a modern mainstream audience, there is very little appeal in a film with such crude effects and a strange narrative. In the ‘80s, however, it fit the zeitgeist of comedy in tragedy.
What was the trailer’s average score in class? Why did it
receive this mark?
The overall rating the trailer received in class was 6/10. As teenagers of a technological and CGI-based era in film, the trailer seemed to lack any shocking or scary elements which meant the film appeared to seem more comedic and amateur. Similarly, the length of the trailer and constant voice over repeating the title also added to the amateur style of the film. This resulted in a loss of interest as the class seemed to perceive the film as a comedy rather than a horror.
The overall rating the trailer received in class was 6/10. As teenagers of a technological and CGI-based era in film, the trailer seemed to lack any shocking or scary elements which meant the film appeared to seem more comedic and amateur. Similarly, the length of the trailer and constant voice over repeating the title also added to the amateur style of the film. This resulted in a loss of interest as the class seemed to perceive the film as a comedy rather than a horror.
Cloverfield Trailer Review
Name of film: Cloverfield
Year Released: 2008
Genre of Trailer: Horror (Scene Trailer)
My Mark after Viewing: 9/10
What happened in the trailer?
This trailer starts in New York at a leaving party for one of the characters. The party is shown through a handheld camera directed by one of the other guests. What starts out looking like a typical Hollywood movie instantly becomes a thriller when the power cuts out and people start rushing around the room. After checking the news and hearing a noise from outside, the gang go to the apartment rooftop and see that something is attacking the city. After running out on to the street, something is seen in the distance and people run in the opposite direction, all before the head of the Statue of Liberty flies down the road and stops in front of the camera. This is then intercut with the credits, before relapsing back to the opening footage of the man’s party and him saying, “Tonight’s gonna be the best night ever.”
This trailer starts in New York at a leaving party for one of the characters. The party is shown through a handheld camera directed by one of the other guests. What starts out looking like a typical Hollywood movie instantly becomes a thriller when the power cuts out and people start rushing around the room. After checking the news and hearing a noise from outside, the gang go to the apartment rooftop and see that something is attacking the city. After running out on to the street, something is seen in the distance and people run in the opposite direction, all before the head of the Statue of Liberty flies down the road and stops in front of the camera. This is then intercut with the credits, before relapsing back to the opening footage of the man’s party and him saying, “Tonight’s gonna be the best night ever.”
Which positive, clever or interesting aspects do you
think you could include in your own trailer? What generic features are
fulfilled well?
Due to the fact that the trailer is filmed entirely with a handheld camera, this gives the feeling that the action happening is very real and that this could happen to anyone. With the setting of a huge city like New York, it also ties in well with other Armageddon-style films in which the Earth is destroyed one city at a time. One of the major points of interest is the lack of music in the trailer. With just the dialogue and sound effects to entice the audience, they are more drawn in to the narrative. By only covering one scene, viewers get a taste for what the movie is like without being spoiled with any other big plot points in the film. One thing which is particularly impressive is how neither the audience, nor the characters, ever see what is attacking the city. This feature cleverly draws in the viewer and makes them interested in going to see the film to find out what the monsters might be. It is this combination of reality and surrealism which I hope to include in our trailer.
Due to the fact that the trailer is filmed entirely with a handheld camera, this gives the feeling that the action happening is very real and that this could happen to anyone. With the setting of a huge city like New York, it also ties in well with other Armageddon-style films in which the Earth is destroyed one city at a time. One of the major points of interest is the lack of music in the trailer. With just the dialogue and sound effects to entice the audience, they are more drawn in to the narrative. By only covering one scene, viewers get a taste for what the movie is like without being spoiled with any other big plot points in the film. One thing which is particularly impressive is how neither the audience, nor the characters, ever see what is attacking the city. This feature cleverly draws in the viewer and makes them interested in going to see the film to find out what the monsters might be. It is this combination of reality and surrealism which I hope to include in our trailer.
Which aspects of the trailer did you think were
unsuccessful, and would put off its target audience? How is it disappointing?
Although it uses key horror conventions, one of the major drawbacks of the film is that it doesn’t sell the horror aspect enough. In all, it feels more like an action film than a horror or thriller. With the addition of some body gore or a ‘jump’ to scare the audience, people might be more aware of what to expect from the film. There is also the issue that, like the Blair Witch Project, a lot of audiences find long handheld shots to be dizzying, and often amateur. Although the lack of music means the audience can be more drawn in to the scene, this does create an issue of pace in which they don’t get a big build up and then a shocking ending.
Although it uses key horror conventions, one of the major drawbacks of the film is that it doesn’t sell the horror aspect enough. In all, it feels more like an action film than a horror or thriller. With the addition of some body gore or a ‘jump’ to scare the audience, people might be more aware of what to expect from the film. There is also the issue that, like the Blair Witch Project, a lot of audiences find long handheld shots to be dizzying, and often amateur. Although the lack of music means the audience can be more drawn in to the scene, this does create an issue of pace in which they don’t get a big build up and then a shocking ending.
What was the trailer’s average score in class? Why did it
receive this mark?
The average score for this trailer was 8 out of 10. Overall, the class agreed that the idea of a scene trailer worked very well and drew the audience in. However, with this film in particular, many people felt that a better scene could have been chosen which included an impressive bit of body gore or fast-paced action to excite the audience and intrigue them to want to see the movie. On the positive side, the majority liked the handheld- style, but some found that 2 hours of it would be too much to handle.
The average score for this trailer was 8 out of 10. Overall, the class agreed that the idea of a scene trailer worked very well and drew the audience in. However, with this film in particular, many people felt that a better scene could have been chosen which included an impressive bit of body gore or fast-paced action to excite the audience and intrigue them to want to see the movie. On the positive side, the majority liked the handheld- style, but some found that 2 hours of it would be too much to handle.
Evil Dead Trailer Review
Name of film: Evil Dead
Year Released: 2013
Genre of Trailer: Gory Horror
My Mark after Viewing: 10/10
What happened in the trailer?
Based on the 1981 classic horror, the Evil Dead trailer uses many of the same conventions as the original. However, with the added use of clever gore effects and CGI, the film is set to become an instant classic when it’s released this year. The trailer shows a group of teenagers visiting a cabin in the woods. One of the characters discovers a book which warns of an evil spirit. Because of this, one of the female characters is then possessed by this being and goes on a rampage to take down each of her friends. Some of the more graphic gory scenes include: someone on fire, cutting an arm off with a chainsaw, pulling a needle out of an eye, and the girl cutting her tongue in half and kissing another girl, drowning her in blood.
Based on the 1981 classic horror, the Evil Dead trailer uses many of the same conventions as the original. However, with the added use of clever gore effects and CGI, the film is set to become an instant classic when it’s released this year. The trailer shows a group of teenagers visiting a cabin in the woods. One of the characters discovers a book which warns of an evil spirit. Because of this, one of the female characters is then possessed by this being and goes on a rampage to take down each of her friends. Some of the more graphic gory scenes include: someone on fire, cutting an arm off with a chainsaw, pulling a needle out of an eye, and the girl cutting her tongue in half and kissing another girl, drowning her in blood.
Which positive, clever or interesting aspects do you
think you could include in your own trailer? What generic features are
fulfilled well?
One of the particularly successful features of the trailer is the suspense-filled music. The use of silence interspersed with loud, fast-paced beats gives the trailer a good sense of terror and rhythm. It also sets the pace very nicely throughout. The most shocking part of the trailer is the blood and gore. As it’s a red band trailer there is bound to be more serious horror for a much older audience. The special effects of the tongue splitting and the eyeball are very impressive and create a sense of unease for the audience, compelling them to want to watch more and see really just how bad things get in the film. Also established throughout is a good sense of the narrative. With the inclusion of the possessed girl and the man reading from the book we are given a sense of what to expect in the story line. Another positive aspect is the multiple uses of references to the original movie. Taken directly from the original were the tree branch and cellar scenes. As this franchise is so iconic, mainly for being a comedic parody, the newer film has a lot to draw from. One of the main differences, however, is less of a focus on comedy, and more about making it particularly gory. Something which I found particularly impressive, and which I would like to feature in our film, was the use of low key lighting and creepy locations. These generic conventions give a sense of claustrophobia and entrapment which makes the audience feel uneasy.
One of the particularly successful features of the trailer is the suspense-filled music. The use of silence interspersed with loud, fast-paced beats gives the trailer a good sense of terror and rhythm. It also sets the pace very nicely throughout. The most shocking part of the trailer is the blood and gore. As it’s a red band trailer there is bound to be more serious horror for a much older audience. The special effects of the tongue splitting and the eyeball are very impressive and create a sense of unease for the audience, compelling them to want to watch more and see really just how bad things get in the film. Also established throughout is a good sense of the narrative. With the inclusion of the possessed girl and the man reading from the book we are given a sense of what to expect in the story line. Another positive aspect is the multiple uses of references to the original movie. Taken directly from the original were the tree branch and cellar scenes. As this franchise is so iconic, mainly for being a comedic parody, the newer film has a lot to draw from. One of the main differences, however, is less of a focus on comedy, and more about making it particularly gory. Something which I found particularly impressive, and which I would like to feature in our film, was the use of low key lighting and creepy locations. These generic conventions give a sense of claustrophobia and entrapment which makes the audience feel uneasy.
Which aspects of the trailer did you think were
unsuccessful, and would put off its target audience? How is it disappointing?
As already stated, I gave this movie a 10 out of 10 because I felt there were very few things wrong with it. However, from an audience’s perspective, one thing which could deter people from wanting to see the film is the amount of shocking moments included in the trailer. As it is conventional for horror trailers to use their most shocking and explicit scenes in their trailers, this might just give away too much for audiences to expect to be shocked even further. Similarly, the the narrative structure of the trailer can make the film appear to be predictable which can reduce the chances of getting a reaction from the audience. To avoid losing audience interest in our own trailer I believe the best solution is to combine a highlights trailer and a scene trailer to give a good sense of what to expect, without giving too much away. In addition to this, as a group, we decided to include gore, action and psychological horror so there is something for everyone.
As already stated, I gave this movie a 10 out of 10 because I felt there were very few things wrong with it. However, from an audience’s perspective, one thing which could deter people from wanting to see the film is the amount of shocking moments included in the trailer. As it is conventional for horror trailers to use their most shocking and explicit scenes in their trailers, this might just give away too much for audiences to expect to be shocked even further. Similarly, the the narrative structure of the trailer can make the film appear to be predictable which can reduce the chances of getting a reaction from the audience. To avoid losing audience interest in our own trailer I believe the best solution is to combine a highlights trailer and a scene trailer to give a good sense of what to expect, without giving too much away. In addition to this, as a group, we decided to include gore, action and psychological horror so there is something for everyone.
What was the trailer’s average score in class? Why did it
receive this mark?
On average, the trailer received 9.7/10 from class scores. As a group, everyone was impressed and shocked by the amount of gory horror shown. However, some felt it could detract from the narrative. Overall, this was the highest scoring trailer from the whole class.
On average, the trailer received 9.7/10 from class scores. As a group, everyone was impressed and shocked by the amount of gory horror shown. However, some felt it could detract from the narrative. Overall, this was the highest scoring trailer from the whole class.
Film Review 2 - Husk
Film Title – Husk
Year of Production – 2008
Director – Brett Simmons
Genre – Horror (Drama / Thriller)
Brief Plot Outline:
A group of five friends are
stranded near a desolate cornfield, when their car breaks down.
They try to find help, as one by
one they go missing or are dragged off by an evil spirit
embodied in the scarecrows of the
cornfield.
Which of the two scenes impressed
you the most? Why?
Scene 1: Scott and Brian find the
house in the cornfield (which looks suspiciously like the interior of the Texas Chain Saw
Massacre house). They hear something upstairs and realise that Johnny, their missing friend,
is sat in a dilapidated room at a sewing machine, not responding to them. I liked the
way this scene built tension, through the rhythm of the sewing machine and at Scott and Brian's
attempts to get Johnny's attention.
Scene 2: Chris is trying to jump
start the car in the cornfield when the scarecrow attacks the front of the car. The thing that
makes this scene stand out is the relentlessness of the attack, with the scarecrow smashing its
head against the windows. There is also an added plot twist, when it turns out to be Johnny
attacking Chris. Plus, the addition of a second attack right after the first was unexpected and a good
choice.
How has watching this film helped
you to understand this genre of filmmaking?
Which features on the genre
checklist did you spot in the film? When? How?
Modern horror movies, like this
one, use the convention of fewer characters trapped in one
confined space, with no means of
escape. They have also utilised the 'Teen Slasher' idea,
using young characters and lots of
gore. As an overall view, particular attention is paid to
the small details of horror, such
as the nails in their fingers, as opposed to relentless blood
and violence. The film starts
during the day, but very quickly the sun sets and the rest of
the film is in near darkness,
adding to the chiaroscuro effects of light and shade.
Features of the genre checklist:
1: Mise-en-scene:
- blood, gore (body horror)
- restricted narration
- creepy location
- low key lighting
Scene example: The setting of the house and the scene in which the group first hears noises coming from upstairs. After investigating, they find the empty room with the sewing machine.
2: Sound
- parallel music
Scene Example: Running through the cornfield, away from the scarecrows and the tempo increasing as their running speed increases
3: Narrative:
- unhappy and open
endings
Scene Example: All but one of the group survives. The final survivor calls out to warn a couple who have stopped by the road. However, they don't see him and the narrative starts again when one of them goes to explore the field.
Scene Example: All but one of the group survives. The final survivor calls out to warn a couple who have stopped by the road. However, they don't see him and the narrative starts again when one of them goes to explore the field.
4: Editing:
- quick montage
- slow montage
- collision cutting
Scene Example: Chris is attacked by the scarecrow whilst trying to jumpstart the abandoned car.
5: Cinematography:
- close-ups
- canted angles
- handheld
- point of view
Scene Example: There are numerous POV shots from the various characters as they run to meet their friends.
6: Characters:
- quick moving
monster
- female victim
- male hero
Scene Example: The opening scene shows the group of friends quickly established into their stereotypes and the central 'romance'.
7: Themes:
- violence – fear of
death
- loneliness – fear
of being trapped
Scene Example: As the whole film takes place in the cornfield over one night, there is no escape and no way of finding the other characters, unless it's a coincidence.
8: Ideologies:
- sexism to women (very small
amount)
- feeling outside the Cultural
Dominant Ideology
Scene Example: The men think Natalie should not be left alone and one of them acts as her chaperone.
Which aspects of the film would
you like to INCLUDE in your own trailer?
- Good use of chiaroscuro, which adds to the drama of the scene and can make anylocation seem creepy
- The establishment of a variety of characters, making you feel sympathy if they die
- Restricted narration, adding mystery and suspense
- A combination of slow/quick montages, building up to a climax
- Handheld camera shots with audio to give the impression you're seeing things from a character's point of view
- Close-ups to show emotion or to point out something important
- 'One-liners' to create a false sense of comedy and to relieve tension
- A girlfriend/boyfriend pair- stereotypical, but works well
Which aspects of the film
would you AVOID in your own trailer?
- The film included
a character who supplied us with a back story, when he repeatedly
kept getting visions
of the family who owned the house. This became repetetive, boring and
really didn't need to be included.
-The use of a fast
moving monster is unneccessary. I would try to avoid showing the
monster at all, to create mystery. An example of this being the
'Cloverfield' trailer.
What was the best aspect / more
enjoyable moment in the film? Why? Can you recreate this in your own
film? How?
The most enjoyable aspect of the film was the way in which each of the characters broke their stereotypes by the end of the film and each one had acted as a hero in some way. In particular, Natalie, having been put down by the other men, works hard to save herself and her friends and is one of the final survivors. Similarly, the final survivor, who has been having the visions, is seen as a kind of nerd. By the end, however, he acts as the male hero. I would like to include these aspects in our trailer. As our group only consists of three of us, each of us female, this could be difficult. It does, however, defy boundaries, as one of us will have to act as the female 'hero'. There will also be no men to 'save the day'.
Saturday, 30 March 2013
Friday, 1 March 2013
Film Review 1 - Silent Hill
Film Title – Silent Hill
Year of Production – 2006
Director – Christophe Gans
Genre – Horror / Mystery
Brief Plot
Outline
A woman goes in search of her daughter within the confines of
a strange, desolate town called ‘Silent Hill’. The narrative is based on a
videogame.
Most
Impressive Scenes
Scene one: Sacrificing Officer Cybil Bennett by burning her
at the stake.
I liked this scene for many reasons. Firstly, in terms of horror conventions, everything is flipped upside down. The main cast consists almost entirely of women and this scene shows the combination of a female villain, victim and child, all whilst performing a very violent act in the process. It doesn’t follow the normal horror conventions of keeping the women pure and restricting the violence on screen. Cybil starts the scene as a hero coming to the rescue, but soon she is killed in the same way they almost killed Alessa. The other area of significance here is the good use of effects and make-up for the burning flesh and the fact that they didn’t hold back when showing this event take place.
I liked this scene for many reasons. Firstly, in terms of horror conventions, everything is flipped upside down. The main cast consists almost entirely of women and this scene shows the combination of a female villain, victim and child, all whilst performing a very violent act in the process. It doesn’t follow the normal horror conventions of keeping the women pure and restricting the violence on screen. Cybil starts the scene as a hero coming to the rescue, but soon she is killed in the same way they almost killed Alessa. The other area of significance here is the good use of effects and make-up for the burning flesh and the fact that they didn’t hold back when showing this event take place.
Scene two: Cybil arrests Rose.
When Officer Bennett arrests Rose and they try to walk back, there is a dead end drop off a cliff where the road should be. To ass to the drama of the situation, the sirens go off and the creatures start coming after them. When Cybil tries to shoot one, nothing happens. This urgency is amplified by a quick montage of shots. Combined with the dead end, and the grey fog, this scene leads to a sense of entrapment and isolation. This is aided by the fact that Rose is, ironically, handcuffed and can do nothing to help.
When Officer Bennett arrests Rose and they try to walk back, there is a dead end drop off a cliff where the road should be. To ass to the drama of the situation, the sirens go off and the creatures start coming after them. When Cybil tries to shoot one, nothing happens. This urgency is amplified by a quick montage of shots. Combined with the dead end, and the grey fog, this scene leads to a sense of entrapment and isolation. This is aided by the fact that Rose is, ironically, handcuffed and can do nothing to help.
Features of
the Genre Checklist
Mise-en-scene
·
Body horror – Cybil being burnt at the stake
- Makes use of specialised horror effects for the audience’s satisfaction
- Makes use of specialised horror effects for the audience’s satisfaction
·
Restricted narration – Unclear flashbacks
- Adds drama and tension
- Adds drama and tension
·
Creepy enclosed locations – Filthy bathroom in school
- Conventional of horror films
- Conventional of horror films
·
Low key lighting – Under the church
- Makes the scene appear more sinister and claustrophobic
- Makes the scene appear more sinister and claustrophobic
Sound
·
Parallel music – Dark nurses attacking Rose
- Keeps a steady pace throughout the scene
- Keeps a steady pace throughout the scene
Editing
·
Quick montage – Running to the church for safety
- Creates tension for the characters
- Creates tension for the characters
·
Slow montage – Rose tries to find Alessa under the
church
- Puts the audience on edge, waiting for something to happen
- Puts the audience on edge, waiting for something to happen
·
Collision cutting – When Rose / Chris are both in
Silent Hill
- Makes the film feel like more of a cinematic experience by paralleling the two scenes.
- Makes the film feel like more of a cinematic experience by paralleling the two scenes.
Cinematography
·
Close-ups – Chris’s confusion about his wife’s
whereabouts (shown in his expression)
- Makes the actors’ performance choices more clear
- Makes the actors’ performance choices more clear
Narrative
·
Unhappy ending – Chris can’t see Rose and Sharon when
they get home (and vice versa)
- This type of ending is expected from a horror movie
- This type of ending is expected from a horror movie
·
Open ending – Alessa is still alive (as is Sharon)
- Gives way for a sequel
- Gives way for a sequel
Characters
·
Psycho killer – Christabella
- One person having the control to kill numerous people heightens fear
- One person having the control to kill numerous people heightens fear
·
Slow moving monster – Pyramid head demon
- Adds a further obstacle
- Adds a further obstacle
·
Quick moving monster – Dark nurses
- Sets a fast pace and strain on the audience’s nerves
- Sets a fast pace and strain on the audience’s nerves
·
Female victim – Cybil (?)
- This could be questioned because Cybil practically sacrificed herself after being the hero for quite a large portion of the movie
- This could be questioned because Cybil practically sacrificed herself after being the hero for quite a large portion of the movie
·
Male hero – Chris
- Stereotypical male hero who will stop at nothing to find his family
- Stereotypical male hero who will stop at nothing to find his family
·
Female survivor – Rose
- Not so stereotypical: blonde hair (not tied up), impractical, reasonably older. However, as a mother, this could help her in survival.
- Not so stereotypical: blonde hair (not tied up), impractical, reasonably older. However, as a mother, this could help her in survival.
Themes
·
Feeling outside of the C.D.I. – Silent Hill, plus, the
main characters struggling with their ‘different’ daughter
- Feeling out of place in a situation is typical of almost every horror film
- Feeling out of place in a situation is typical of almost every horror film
·
Sadism – Christabella and Alessa
- Adds to the connotations of religious sacrifice and Satanism
- Adds to the connotations of religious sacrifice and Satanism
Aspects to
Include in my own Trailer
·
Obstructing the view from the audience e.g. the fog
around Silent Hill. This technique works like restricted narration except there
is the added element of surprise, knowing anything could pop up on screen
quickly.
·
Chiaroscuro – Applied here, it is mainly contrasted
between the Silent Hill Rose is in, and the Silent Hill Chris is in.
·
Parallel editing – To show what two characters are
doing at the same time.
·
Wide / Establishing shots show the location and / or
the people in the scene.
·
Psychological horror - Very little emphasis on
violence; more of a narrative based horror / thriller with only pronounced
violence right at the end.
Aspects to
Avoid in my own Trailer
·
Religious ideologies, like those included in Silent
Hill, can become confusing, often controversial, and usually inaccurate details
are included.
·
Multiple monsters / threats / villains – In this film
there were too many good vs. evil parts and some issues weren’t even resolved
by the end. A lot of the ‘monsters’ were simply there to fill time and weren’t
explained. In general, one carefully designed villain can be much more
memorable and ‘iconic’ (e.g. Freddie Krueger, Michael Myers etc.).
·
There was not much
body horror in this film, but the bits that were violent were very gory and sometimes too extreme. An
example of this is when Christabella is overthrown at the end and her body is
torn in half by thorny roots. Not only is this unrealistic, it looked like an
opportunity to satisfy gore fans without much reason.
The Best
Aspects of the Film
The best aspect of this film is the sense of entrapment and
isolation. In the film they use fog, dark spaces, and small rooms to get this
feeling. All of these things are either available or can be created for our own
filming.
There are numerous scenes with this feeling: e.g. When Rose
and Cybil are trying to get back to the road; when they are attacked by
insects, and when Rose must walk through the Dark Nurses.
This technique makes the audience feel uneasy and also
encourages you to want the characters to succeed in what they are trying to
achieve.
How the
Film Reflects Institutional and Historical Contexts
Sharon’s Disappearances
In the time surrounding the release of the film, and the videogame (1999), there was a big controversy around child protection laws, especially a fear of abduction. In 1993, just 6 years before the release of the videogame, a law was passed in America to prevent the taking of children outside of the country (by means of abduction / kidnapping). This goes to explain Rose’s panic every time Sharon is missing of left alone, especially considering the fact that she sleepwalks.
In the time surrounding the release of the film, and the videogame (1999), there was a big controversy around child protection laws, especially a fear of abduction. In 1993, just 6 years before the release of the videogame, a law was passed in America to prevent the taking of children outside of the country (by means of abduction / kidnapping). This goes to explain Rose’s panic every time Sharon is missing of left alone, especially considering the fact that she sleepwalks.
The ‘Videogame’ Aspect
Around the time in which the film was made, there was an influx of videogame sales of all sorts. Within the last 10 years, videogames have become part of everyday life for some people. Although the film is only loosely based on the videogame, it still attracted audiences – particularly those who owned it on the Play Station etc. The game is similar to general horror films in the sense that there usually isn’t much consequence to the characters’ actions as there would be in real life. This means we can suspend disbelief for a short while and feel like we are part of a videogame when we watch the movie. The special effects also help with the feeling of being locked into a game.
Around the time in which the film was made, there was an influx of videogame sales of all sorts. Within the last 10 years, videogames have become part of everyday life for some people. Although the film is only loosely based on the videogame, it still attracted audiences – particularly those who owned it on the Play Station etc. The game is similar to general horror films in the sense that there usually isn’t much consequence to the characters’ actions as there would be in real life. This means we can suspend disbelief for a short while and feel like we are part of a videogame when we watch the movie. The special effects also help with the feeling of being locked into a game.
Religious Features
Consistently a theme throughout many American films, religion is particularly a major influence on horror films. The conflict between Alessa and Christabella (canonically, a name which includes the word ‘Christ’) represents the wider stereotype of Islamism vs. Christianity. Made shortly after the attacks of 9/11, the fear of terrorism was a big aspect of American culture at the time, and horror movies of this period easily reflect that.
Consistently a theme throughout many American films, religion is particularly a major influence on horror films. The conflict between Alessa and Christabella (canonically, a name which includes the word ‘Christ’) represents the wider stereotype of Islamism vs. Christianity. Made shortly after the attacks of 9/11, the fear of terrorism was a big aspect of American culture at the time, and horror movies of this period easily reflect that.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)